Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: any chance of 2.6.0-test*? | From | Terje Eggestad <> | Date | 13 Jan 2003 17:25:46 +0100 |
| |
On man, 2003-01-13 at 16:49, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13 2003, Terje Eggestad wrote: > > Considering that doing kernel development is hard enough, new > > development is almost always done on uni processors kernels that do only > > one thing at the time. Then when you base logic is OK, you move to a > > SMP, which means (adding and) debugging you spin locks. > > Goto's aside, I find the above extremely bad advise. You should _always_ > develop with smp and for smp from the very start, or you will most > likely not get it right later on. With preempt, this becomes even more > important.
You should, and I do, *design* with smp in mind, and I throw in smplock/unlonk as I go, but I tend to make first runs on a UP.
I see your point on preemt, though. You do first runs on SMP?
> > Considering that fucking up spin locks are prone to corrupting your > > machine, one very simple trick to makeing fewer mistakes to to have one, > > and only one, unlock for every lock. > > Taking a spin lock twice will hard lock the machine, however on smp you > will typically have the luxury of an nmi watchdog which will help you > solve this quickly. Double unlock will oops immediately if you run with > spin lock debugging (you probably should, if you are developing kernel > code).
I have the console on a serial port, and a terminal server. With kdb, you can enter the kernel i kdb even when deadlocked.
TJ
-- _________________________________________________________________________
Terje Eggestad mailto:terje.eggestad@scali.no Scali Scalable Linux Systems http://www.scali.com
Olaf Helsets Vei 6 tel: +47 22 62 89 61 (OFFICE) P.O.Box 150, Oppsal +47 975 31 574 (MOBILE) N-0619 Oslo fax: +47 22 62 89 51 NORWAY _________________________________________________________________________
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |