Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 12 Jan 2003 17:14:34 +0100 (CET) | Subject | Re: choice of raid5 checksumming algorithm wrong ? | From | Rene Rebe <> |
| |
Hi.
Hm - for me the different throughputs are a nice initial benchmark ... - I like them being printed out.
On: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:44:44 -0500 (EST), "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com> wrote: > > Hello Rene , All , How about just printing the algorithm that is > chosen & not the others ? Just an idea . JimL > > On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Rene Rebe wrote: > > Hi. > > In the case s.o. wants to pull the patch: > > http://www.rocklinux.org/sources/package/base/linux24/82-raid5-niceer-output.patch > > It is only a one-liner. It is not really nice since I print the > > "writing arround L2 cache" text when XOR_SELECT_TEMPLATE is defined - > > this might also be the case for an later AlitVec version for PowerPC > > or so. So we might want a more generic text - or a text in the > > appropriated .h file whetre XOR_SELECT_TEMPLATE is defined ... > -- > +------------------------------------------------------------------+ > | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS | > | Network Engineer | P.O. Box 854 | Give me Linux | > | babydr@baby-dragons.com | Coudersport PA 16915 | only on AXP | > +------------------------------------------------------------------+ > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |