lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?
    From
    Date
    On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:59:57 EST, Rob Wilkens said:

    > In general, if you can structure your code properly, you should never
    > need a goto, and if you don't need a goto you shouldn't use it. It's
    > just "common sense" as I've always been taught. Unless you're
    > intentionally trying to write code that's harder for others to read.

    Now, it's provable you never *NEED* a goto. On the other hand, *judicious*
    use of goto can prevent code that is so cluttered with stuff of the form:

    if(...) {
    ...
    die_flag = 1;
    if (!die _flag) {...

    Pretty soon, you have die_1_flag, die_2_flag, die_3_flag and so on,
    rather than 3 or 4 "goto bail_now;".

    The real problem is that C doesn't have a good multi-level "break" construct.
    On the other hand, I don't know of any language that has a good one - some
    allow "break 3;" to break 3 levels- but that's still bad because you get
    screwed if somebody adds an 'if' clause....

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:32    [W:0.018 / U:93.624 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site