![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:10:24PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Oliver Xymoron wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:36:50PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/intel-iscsi [..] > > Don't know what the state of interop with other initiators is though. > > > > I'll also point out that for many Linux<->Linux purposes, nbd is a workable > > substitute. > > You are so correct in the Linux<->Linux model, but remember the other OS > has the dominate market space. Really? Must admit I haven't been paying attention to FreeBSD lately.. ;) > I have proof of interoperability. Better yet I have performance > proof without the ability to control the benchmark environment. I'm sure that's great, but until it's also DFSG compliant, it's effectively vaporware in my book. > IIRC that reference is set at version 6. They're actually up to 18. -- "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||