lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Jan]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Fromscott thomason <>
SubjectRe: Impact of scheduler tunables on interactive response (was Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio)
DateWed, 1 Jan 2003 11:15:12 -0600
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 10:05 am, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> This sounds very like my resp2 (www.unyuug.org/benchmarks/) program
> I announced on this list some months ago, but resp2 generates loads
> of a specific type so that you can determine of changes affect i/o
> load, swapping load, CPU load, etc

Have you (or anyone else) used resp2 to measure the impact of the 
scheduler tunables on interactive responsiveness yet, and if so, what 
are your conclusions?

Also, your benchmark page doesn't list a URL for resp2. Sure, I could 
Google for one, but wouldn't it be nice to update your page, too? 
---scott

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2008