[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][RFC] per isr in_progress markers

    On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > Remember: you'd be "improving latency" by taking several interrupts
    > instead of taking just one. And usually, if the system is really under
    > so much interrupt load that this would be noticeable, you want to try to
    > _mitigate_ interrupts instead of adding new ones.

    There's also the following effect that could generate additional
    interrupts: the *same* IRQ source that is currently executing might
    generate a (spurious but otherwise harmless) interrupt if we first ACK the
    card then ACK the APIC and then do processing. Our current way of masking
    interrupts in the IO-APIC at least leaves them pending there until the
    handler's main work loop is finished and mitigates irqs.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.022 / U:4.656 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site