lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Early SPECWeb99 results on 2.5.33 with TSO on e1000
    >    The fact that we're doing something different from everyone else
    > and turning up a different set of kernel issues is a good thing,
    > to my mind. You're right, we could use Tux if we wanted to ... but
    > that doesn't stop Apache being interesting ;-)
    >
    > Tux does not obviate Apache from the equation.
    > See my other emails.

    That's not the point ... we're getting sidetracked here. The
    point is: "is this a realistic-ish stick to beat the kernel
    with and expect it to behave" ... I feel the answer is yes.

    The secondary point is "what are customers doing in the field?"
    (not what *should* they be doing ;-)). Moreover, I think the
    Apache + Tux combination has been fairly well beaten on already
    by other people in the past, though I'm sure it could be done
    again.

    I see no reason why turning on NAPI should make the Apache setup
    we have perform worse ... quite the opposite. Yes, we could use
    Tux, yes we'd get better results. But that's not the point ;-)

    M.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:3.447 / U:0.016 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site