![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
In message <20020903.231907.21327801.davem@redhat.com> you write: > > Actually Rusty what's the big deal, add an "initializer" > arg to the macro. It doesn't hurt anyone, it doesn't lose > any space in the kernel image, and the macro arg reminds > people to do it. > > I think it's a small price to pay to keep a longer range > of compilers supported :-) I disagree. They might not have a convenient (static) initializer, in which case it's simply cruel and unusual, to work around an obscure compiler bug. Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:28 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||