![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 04:10:42PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> The MODE_SENSE bit is fine by me. But it's a SCSI change, so I'm not the
> person to ask. The fix to sddr09.c for that seems reasonable, but you put
> it all together and I haven't had time to split it up. Of course, I fully
> expect the changes to MODE_SENSE in the SCSI layer to break other USB
> devices, but there is only one way to find out....
Speaking of sddr09 devices (of which I possess one), what's the current
state of support for the sddr09? Last I knew, at the time when I finally
got mine working, the sddr09 was only supported read-only, since there
were not-fully-understood issues that resulted in filesystem corruption
if you tried to write to it. Currently, the driver will still allow me
to mount it only as a read-only filesystem. Can write support for the
sddr09 be expected any time soon?
--
********* Fight Back! It may not be just YOUR life at risk. *********
phil stracchino :: alaric@babcom.com :: halmayne@sourceforge.net
unix ronin :::: renaissance man :::: mystic zen biker geek
2000 CBR929RR, 1991 VFR750F3 (foully murdered), 1986 VF500F (sold)
Linux Now! ...because friends don't let friends use Microsoft.[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:22 [W:0.407 / U:0.000 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||