[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Important per-cpu fix.

    On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
    > Oh, "I'm" willing to upgrade "my" compiler, it's my users that are the
    > problem. If you impose 3.1 or whatever, I get less people testing on
    > sparc64 as a result.

    Oh, well. I couldn't use gcc 3.* on sparc64 for some weird reason, gcc
    2.95* is unable to handle all that crap, and the egcs hackup can't handle
    the current kernel code. So what?

    --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-/.-./..././.-../..-. .---/..-/.../- .-
    --/../-./..-/-/./--..-- ../.----./.-../.-.. --./../...-/. -.--/---/..-
    .- -/---/--/---/.-./.-./---/.--/.-.-.-

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.021 / U:10.876 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site