lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 30 Sep 2002 01:22:00 -0700
FromChris Wright <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] accessfs v0.6 ported to 2.5.35-lsm1 - 1/2
* James Morris (jmorris@intercode.com.au) wrote:
> > 
> > As for the ip_prot_sock hook in general, does it look ok to the other
> > developers?
> 
> This hook is not necessary: any related access control decision can be
> made via the more generic and flexible socket_bind() hook (like SELinux).

Yes, I had the same impression.
thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2008