![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* James Morris (jmorris@intercode.com.au) wrote: > > > > As for the ip_prot_sock hook in general, does it look ok to the other > > developers? > > This hook is not necessary: any related access control decision can be > made via the more generic and flexible socket_bind() hook (like SELinux). Yes, I had the same impression. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:29 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||