![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> I must say that based on a small amount of performance testing the > benefits of the cache warmness thing are disappointing. Maybe 1% if > you squint. Martin, could you please do a before-and-after on the > NUMAQ's, double check that it is actually doing the right thing? Seems to work just fine: 2.5.38-mm1 + my original hot/cold code. Elapsed: 19.798s User: 191.61s System: 43.322s CPU: 1186.4% 2.5.39-mm1 Elapsed: 19.532s User: 192.25s System: 42.642s CPU: 1203.2% And it's a lot more than 1% for me ;-) About 12% of systime on kernel compile, IIRC. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:29 [W:0.132 / U:0.030 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||