lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 30 Sep 2002 00:51:39 -0700
From"Martin J. Bligh" <>
SubjectRe: 2.5.39-mm1
> I must say that based on a small amount of performance testing the
> benefits of the cache warmness thing are disappointing. Maybe 1% if
> you squint.  Martin, could you please do a before-and-after on the
> NUMAQ's, double check that it is actually doing the right thing?

Seems to work just fine:

2.5.38-mm1 + my original hot/cold code.
Elapsed: 19.798s User: 191.61s System: 43.322s CPU: 1186.4%

2.5.39-mm1
Elapsed: 19.532s User: 192.25s System: 42.642s CPU: 1203.2%

And it's a lot more than 1% for me ;-) About 12% of systime
on kernel compile, IIRC.

M.



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:29    [W:0.132 / U:0.030 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans