![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29 2002, jbradford@dial.pipex.com wrote: > > > Anyway, people who are having VM trouble with the current 2.5.x series, > > > please _complain_, and tell what your workload is. Don't sit silent and > > > make us think we're good to go.. And if Ingo is right, I'll do the 3.0.x > > > thing. > > > > I think the broken IDE in 2.5.x has meant that it got seriously less > > testing overall than previous development trees :-(. Maybe after > > halloween when it stabilises a bit more we'll get more reports in. > > 2.5 is definitely desktop stable, so please test it if you can. Until > recently there was a personal show stopper for me, the tasklist > deadline. Now 2.5 is happily running on my desktop as well. 2.5.38-mm2 has been stable for me on uni, what is the status of SMP? I had what looked like logical to physical mapping problems on a BP6 and Abit dual P5C-166, resulting in syslog data on every drive including those with no Linux partition. That was somewhere around 2.5.22 to 2.5.26. > 2.5 IDE stability should be just as good as 2.4-ac. A laudable goal. -- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:29 [W:0.501 / U:0.080 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||