Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Sep 2002 20:43:20 -0400 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39 |
| |
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:12:54PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Not exactly. All your work on one queue is internally serialize. An > > totally unserialized workqueue would be best for XFS. > > you can create as many queues as you wish - one per CPU for example. Or > one per mounted fs per CPU.
Yeah. But adding a create_workqueue_per_cpu that has one queue and thead per cpu to which queue_work dispatches would centralize the code needed to manage that in one place instead of duplicating it over and over.
Sure both works, but IMHO hiding it behind a nice abstraction is much better.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |