Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] Remove list_t infection. | Date | Wed, 4 Sep 2002 03:52:22 +0200 |
| |
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 02:41, Rusty Russell wrote: > In message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209031610200.10759-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> you > write: > > > > On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > > > > > 1. struct list > > > 2. struct list_node > > > > > > With these two types, `list_add' et al. can actually _check_ that you > > > got the arguments the right way around. > > > > Well, the thing is, one of the _advantages_ of "struct list_head" is > > exactly the fact that the implementation is 100% agnostic about whether a > > list entry is the head, or just part of the list. > > Excellent. Well I'm glad that's sorted. > > Now please apply my patch (which got sidelined by nomenclature fetishers),
Yep, half a frog in the blender is better than no frog.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |