lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: v2.6 vs v3.0
    From
    Date
    Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de> writes:

    > Hi Andi,
    >
    > > Actually current IPv6 is stable and has been for a long time, it's just not
    > > completely standards compliant (but still quite usable for a lot of people)
    >
    > For end systems (no router) with static IPv6 definitions this seems to be
    > true. However, for machines which use autoconfiguration (stateless as
    > there isn't a usable IPv6 capable DHCP server AFAIK) or act as routers,
    > the current state of the implementation of the default route can best be
    > described as buggy. (Autoconfigured machines seem to loose their default
    > route after some time, e.g.).

    Are you sure this is not related to the routing daemon or rdisc daemon you
    use ? In the past when I had problems with lost default routes always such
    a daemon was to blame.

    > So IPv6 is returned by the resolver even though IPv6 isn't available in
    > the kernel. The default of the resolver options should be dependent
    > on the presence or absence of IPv6 in the currently running kernel IMHO.

    Sounds more like an glibc issue. I would file a glibc gnats bug on this,
    then it may even get fixed. The kernel has nothing to do with this at least.

    > Finally, IPv6 sockets which also communicate over IPv4 using mapped
    > addresses are considered bad nowadays ;-)

    Hmm?

    -Andi
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.019 / U:29.952 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site