lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: v2.6 vs v3.0
    Date


    We did catch flak on stability issues on 2.4 for whatever the
    reasons. The way I see it we should not move to 3.0 until it's been
    running stable under at least 2.6. The less technical the person
    the more valuable perception becomes. By only moving to 3.0 when
    2.x is seen as totally stable, more new (corporate) people will
    consider it as the foundation for their infrastructure. Look at the
    views of 2.2...

    Besides, stability must be more important than features!

    --

    Steve Szmidt
    ______________________________________________________

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.025 / U:3.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site