lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: v2.6 vs v3.0
From
Date
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 12:06, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Nah I'm saying that it's always been solid. Why would I suddenly
> destabilize it now? :-)
>

Close enough. Thank you.

> > the case, it sure knocks a few of my worries out of the ball park and I
> > will be that much closer to trying out 2.5.x myself.
>
> As always, it's untested territory so a backup may be in order. But I
> don't view testing 2.5 as any more dangerous as testing 2.4-ac.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe

I used to religiously test out ac kernels (in the 2.2, 2.3.x and early
2.4.x days). I don't anymore, so the comparison may not be valid here.
Anyway, I will try to either test 2.5.x on my router or else find a box
I can play with that doesnt' have so much important data on it. (I hate
to say it, but I haven't been able to afford, $$ wise, backup for a few
years... I know... I can't afford not to either).

Trever

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans