lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: v2.6 vs v3.0
    Date
    > The block IO cleanups are important, and that was the major thing _I_ 
    > personally wanted from the 2.5.x tree when it was opened. I agree with you
    > there. But I don't think they are major-number-material.

    I'd definitely have voted for stable IPV6 being a 3.0.x requirement, but I guess it's a bit late now :-/

    > Anyway, people who are having VM trouble with the current 2.5.x series,
    > please _complain_, and tell what your workload is. Don't sit silent and
    > make us think we're good to go.. And if Ingo is right, I'll do the 3.0.x
    > thing.

    I think the broken IDE in 2.5.x has meant that it got seriously less testing overall than previous development trees :-(. Maybe after halloween when it stabilises a bit more we'll get more reports in.

    John
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.034 / U:0.472 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site