lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 25 Sep 2002 11:52:35 -0300 (BRT)
FromRik van Riel <>
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] fork_load module tested for contest
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:

> I've been trialling a new load module for the contest benchmark
> (http://contest.kolivas.net) which simply forks a process that does
> nothing, waits for it to die, then repeats. Here are the results I have
> obtained so far:

> fork_load:
> Kernel Time CPU Ratio
> 2.4.19 100.05 69% 1.37
> 2.4.19-ck7 74.65 95% 1.02
> 2.5.38 77.35 95% 1.06
> 2.5.38-mm2 76.99 95% 1.06
>
> ck7 uses O1, preempt, low latency

Looks like the O(1) scheduler has a problem, then. The continuous
fork() loop should get 20% of the CPU, not 5%.

regards,

Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2010