Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:52:35 -0300 (BRT) | | From | Rik van Riel <> | | Subject | Re: [BENCHMARK] fork_load module tested for contest |
| |
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:
> I've been trialling a new load module for the contest benchmark > (http://contest.kolivas.net) which simply forks a process that does > nothing, waits for it to die, then repeats. Here are the results I have > obtained so far:
> fork_load: > Kernel Time CPU Ratio > 2.4.19 100.05 69% 1.37 > 2.4.19-ck7 74.65 95% 1.02 > 2.5.38 77.35 95% 1.06 > 2.5.38-mm2 76.99 95% 1.06 > > ck7 uses O1, preempt, low latency
Looks like the O(1) scheduler has a problem, then. The continuous fork() loop should get 20% of the CPU, not 5%.
regards,
Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |