lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
>
> > > It would sure be nice for this sortof test if there were
> > > some sort of a "flush-all-caches" syscall...
> >
> > I think all you need to do is reload the code-segment register
> > and you end up flushing caches in ix86.
>
> i'm pretty sure what was meant was the flushing of the pagecache mainly.
> The state of CPU caches does not really play in these several-minutes
> benchmarks, they are at most a few millisecs worth of CPU time to build.
>

Okay. Sorry about that.


Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
The US military has given us many words, FUBAR, SNAFU, now ENRON.
Yes, top management were graduates of West Point and Annapolis.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.200 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site