[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results
Quoting Erik Andersen <>:

> On Mon Sep 23, 2002 at 08:30:21PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Yes you make a very valid point and something I've been stewing over
> privately
> > for some time. contest runs benchmarks in a fixed order with a "priming"
> compile
> > to try and get pagecaches etc back to some sort of baseline (I've been
> trying
> > hard to make the results accurate and repeatable).
> It would sure be nice for this sortof test if there were
> some sort of a "flush-all-caches" syscall...

For the moment I think I'll also add a swapoff/swapon before each compile as
well (thanks Luuk for the suggestion). I'm still looking at the raw data to
figure out what to do.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.080 / U:8.204 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site