lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results
    Quoting Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>:

    > On Mon Sep 23, 2002 at 08:30:21PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
    > > Yes you make a very valid point and something I've been stewing over
    > privately
    > > for some time. contest runs benchmarks in a fixed order with a "priming"
    > compile
    > > to try and get pagecaches etc back to some sort of baseline (I've been
    > trying
    > > hard to make the results accurate and repeatable).
    >
    > It would sure be nice for this sortof test if there were
    > some sort of a "flush-all-caches" syscall...

    For the moment I think I'll also add a swapoff/swapon before each compile as
    well (thanks Luuk for the suggestion). I'm still looking at the raw data to
    figure out what to do.

    Con.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.022 / U:0.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site