Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:55:10 +0200 | Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 | From | Peter Waechtler <> |
| |
Am Montag den, 23. September 2002, um 12:05, schrieb Bill Davidsen:
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Larry McVoy wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 08:55:39PM +0200, Peter Waechtler wrote: >>> AIX and Irix deploy M:N - I guess for a good reason: it's more >>> flexible and combine both approaches with easy runtime tuning if >>> the app happens to run on SMP (the uncommon case). >> >> No, AIX and IRIX do it that way because their processes are so bloated >> that it would be unthinkable to do a 1:1 model. > > And BSD? And Solaris?
Don't know. I don't have access to all those Unices. I could try FreeBSD.
According to http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html Sun is moving to 1:1 and FreeBSD still believes in M:N
MacOSX 10.1 does not support PROCESS_SHARED locks, tried that 5 minutes ago.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |