lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 22 Sep 2002 22:33:54 -0700
FromWilliam Lee Irwin III <>
SubjectRe: 2.5.38-mm1 dbench 512 might sleep backtrace emitted
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Trace; c01175f7 <__might_sleep+27/2b>

On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:31:04PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Well I can't immediately see any held locks on that path, can
> you?  Odd.
> Might be best to put a breakpoint on the printk in __might_sleep(),
> get some more info if it bites again.
> If there _are_ no locks held in that chain then there is
> something wrong with in_atomic().  So check the current
> task state with `task25' and `thread25' from my .gdbinit.

I squirted it out just in case someone (i.e. you) recognized it off the
bat. I'm looking into it myself also with methods similar to what's
suggested.


Cheers,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:29    [W:0.048 / U:0.030 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans