[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1
    On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 11:43:15AM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
    > > Unless major flaws in the design are found this code is intended to
    > > become the standard POSIX thread library on Linux system and it will
    > > be included in the GNU C library distribution.
    > If the comment that this doesn't work with the stable kernel is correct, I
    > consider that a pretty major flaw. Unlike the kernel and NGPT which are
    > developed using an open source model with lots of eyes on the WIP, this
    > was done and then released whole with the decision to include it in the
    > standard library already made. Having any part of glibc not work with the
    > current stable kernel doesn't seem like such a hot idea, honestly.

    glibc supports .note.ABI-tag notes for libraries, so there is no problem
    with having NPTL --enable-kernel=2.5.36 in say
    /lib/i686/ and linuxthreads --enable-kernel=2.2.1 in
    /lib/ The dynamic linker will then choose based
    on currently running kernel.
    (well, ATM because of libc tsd DL_ERROR --without-tls cannot be used
    with --with-tls libs and vice versa, but that is beeing worked on).

    That's similar to non-FLOATING_STACK and FLOATING_STACK linuxthreads,
    the latter can be used with 2.4.8+ or something kernels on IA-32.

    > > - - The general compiler requirement for glibc is at least gcc 3.2. For
    > > the new thread code it is even necessary to have working support for
    > > the __thread keyword.
    > >
    > > Similarly, binutils with functioning TLS support are needed.
    > >
    > > The (Null) beta release of the upcoming Red Hat Linux product is
    > > known to have the necessary tools available after updating from the
    > > latest binaries on the FTP site. This is no ploy to force everybody
    > > to use Red Hat Linux, it's just the only environment known to date
    > > which works.
    > Of course not, it's coincidence that only Redhat has these things readily
    > available, perhaps because this was developed where no other vendor knew
    > it existed and could have support ready for it.

    Because all of glibc/gcc/binutils TLS support was developed together (and
    still is)? All the changes are publicly available, mostly in the
    corresponding CVS archives.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.024 / U:17.036 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site