![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sunday September 1, wli@holomorphy.com wrote: > On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 01:23, Rusty Russell wrote: > >> This week, it spread to SCTP. > >> "struct list_head" isn't a great name, but having two names for > >> everything is yet another bar to reading kernel source. > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 01:51:54AM -0400, Robert Love wrote: > > I am all for your cleanup here, but two nits: > > Why not rename list_head while at it? I would vote for just "struct > > list" ... the name is long, and I like my lines to fit 80 columns. > > Seconded. Throw the whole frog in the blender, please, not just > half. The struct in question is a handle on an element of a list, or the head of a list, but it is not a list itself. A list is a number of stuctures each of which contain (inherit from?) the particular structure. So calling it "struct list" would be wrong, because it isn't a list, only part of one. Maybe "struct list_element" or "struct list_entry" would be OK. But I'm happy with "struct list_head", because the thing is, at least sometimes, the head of a list. NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:28 [W:0.110 / U:0.140 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||