![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Jason Lunz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 12:25AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>It still has several flaws that were pointed out, but this is the base >>from which I would like testing and patching to proceed. (also >>hopefully the flaws are minor in terms of general operation) > > > what's the point of moving rx handling into rx_poll then running it in a > tasklet? I've tested an older variant of that scheme from D-Link and it > doesn't perform as well as my patch. It looks to me like an attempt to > keep this version synced with the NAPI version of the driver, but it > doesn't actually work very well. This is a merge and test point. The whole interrupt handler path is getting updated after this. (but thanks for the feedback, it is noted) > The functional part of my patch was just taking the tx handling from > d-link's driver and ditching the rx part. That and merging in the > cleanups from Becker's driver; most notably ignoring the broken > IntrRxDone bit. Maybe you could show me that in broken-out patches :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:29 [W:0.236 / U:0.460 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||