lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 19 Sep 2002 18:14:15 +1000
FromCon Kolivas <>
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36
Quoting Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>:

> On Wednesday 18 September 2002 18:50, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > > No Load:
> > > > Kernel                  Time            CPU
> > > > 2.4.19                  68.14           99%
> > > > 2.4.20-pre7             68.11           99%
> > > > 2.5.34                  69.88           99%
> > > > 2.4.19-ck7              68.40           98%
> > > > 2.4.19-ck7-rmap         68.73           99%
> > > > 2.4.19-cc               68.37           99%
> > > > 2.5.36                  69.58           99%
> > >
> > > page_add/remove_rmap.  Be interesting to test an Alan kernel too.
> > 
> > Yes, but why are page_add/remove_rmap slower in 2.5 than in
> > Con's -rmap kernel ? ;)
> 
> I don't know what you guys are going on about, these differences are
> getting close to statistically insignificant.

These ones definitely are insignificant. I've found the limit with repeat
measurements about +/- 1%

Con.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2008