![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 18:50, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > No Load: > > > Kernel Time CPU > > > 2.4.19 68.14 99% > > > 2.4.20-pre7 68.11 99% > > > 2.5.34 69.88 99% > > > 2.4.19-ck7 68.40 98% > > > 2.4.19-ck7-rmap 68.73 99% > > > 2.4.19-cc 68.37 99% > > > 2.5.36 69.58 99% > > > > page_add/remove_rmap. Be interesting to test an Alan kernel too. > > Yes, but why are page_add/remove_rmap slower in 2.5 than in > Con's -rmap kernel ? ;) I don't know what you guys are going on about, these differences are getting close to statistically insignificant. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:29 [W:15.811 / U:0.010 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||