[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.34
    Pete Zaitcev wrote:
    > > From: Daniel Phillips <>
    > > Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 07:10:00 +0200
    > >[...]
    > > Let's try a different show of hands: How many users would be happier if
    > > they knew that kernel developers are using modern techniques to improve
    > > the quality of the kernel?
    > I do not see how using a debugger improves a quality of the kernel.
    > Good thinking and coding does improve kernel quality. Debugger
    > certainly does not help if someone cannot code.
    > A debugger can do some good things. Some people argue that it
    > improves productivity, which I think may be true under some
    > circomstances. If your build system sucks and/or slow, and
    > if you work with a binary only software, debugger helps.
    > If you work with something like Linux, and compile on something
    > better than a 333MHz x86, it probably does not help your
    > productivity. This is all wonderful, but has nothing to do
    > with the code quality.

    Uh, I feel obliged to respond to these statements just in case
    anyone thinks they contain anything which is correct.

    I have spent twelve months doing kernel development without kgdb and
    eighteen months with. "With" is better.

    > And to think that your users would be happier with a crap produced
    > by a debugger touting Windows graduate than with a quality code
    > debugged with observation simply defies any reason.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.023 / U:1.848 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site