lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Sep]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Raceless module interface
    On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:


    > > What DoS opportunities are there?
    >
    > Suppose the module exit relies on synchronize_kernel. The attacker
    > can force repeated synchronize_kernels, knowing that module.c will
    > mindlessly do a synchronize_kernel every time a module init fails,
    > whether needed or not. Each synchronize_kernel takes an unbounded
    > amount of time to complete, across which module.c holds a lock.

    That's a good argument WRT the kernel autoloader, but not for manual load
    by root. The system should not refuse to attempt an operation about which
    root may have additional information (odd hardware or the like). We don't
    want to have the kernel DOS itself, but root should be allowed to at least
    try.

    --
    bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
    CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
    Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.020 / U:1.032 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site