Messages in this thread | | | From | "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <> | Date | Sun, 15 Sep 2002 02:23:56 +0800 | Subject | Re: System response benchmarks in performance patches |
| |
From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
> Quoting Paolo Ciarrocchi <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>: > > > [...] > > >http://kernel.kolivas.net under the FAQ. A final >reminder note: it won't > > work on > > >2.5.x > > > > Con, > > I think that only the _memload_ test is not > > working with 2.5.*, am I wrong? > > Correct. memload determines the amount of memory to allocate based on > /proc/meminfo which has changed in 2.5.x Rik has a pacth for this (thanks ;-). Let me know when you are going to release a new version of the benchmark.
[...] > P.S. How does 2.4.19-ck7 compare ;-) Downloaded, compiled and tested ;-) BTW, I tested also the latest compressed cache patch.
_NOLOAD_ Kernel Time CPU 2.4.19 7:37.99 99% 2.5.34 7:47.68 99% 2.4.19-0.24pre4 7:38.17 99% 2.4.19-ck7 7:35.54 99%
_CPULOAD_ Kernel Time CPU 2.4.19 9:07.80 82% 2.5.34 8:50.56 87% 2.4.19-0.24pre4 9:07.61 82% 2.4.19-ck7 8:38.07 87%
_IOLOAD_ Kernel Time CPU 2.4.19 11:23.86 65% 2.5.34 10:48.24 72% 2.4.19-0.24pre4 11:51.79 63% 2.4.19-ck7 10:41.56 71%
_MEMLOAD_ Kernel Time CPU 2.4.19 10:00.63 78% 2.5.34 [7:45.80] [99%] 2.4.19-0.24pre4 10:37.85 78% 2.4.19-ck7 10:46.06 72%
Ciao, Paolo -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org
Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |