Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Sun, 1 Sep 2002 14:10:53 +0200 | From | Tomas Szepe <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] warnkill trivia 2/2 |
| |
> Let's keep the sparc atomic_read() how it is so more bugs > like this can be found.
I don't know, though... scratching my head here -- Is GCC actually able to distinguish between 'const int *a' and 'int const *a'?
Because if 'int const *a' means that the pointer is constant but not the actual value it points to,
void a(int const *a) { *a = 1; }
shouldn't be generating 'warning: assignment of read-only location'. Right?
> Reiserfs is buggy, it means struct buffer_head const * bh
Okay so that gives us the third reiserfs patch of the day:
--- buffer2.c~ 2002-09-01 13:52:39.000000000 +0200 +++ buffer2.c 2002-09-01 13:44:19.000000000 +0200 @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ hold we did free all buffers in tree balance structure (get_empty_nodes and get_nodes_for_preserving) or in path structure only (get_new_buffer) just before calling this */ -void wait_buffer_until_released (const struct buffer_head * bh) +void wait_buffer_until_released (struct buffer_head const *bh) { int repeat_counter = 0; - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |