Messages in this thread | | | From | "Martin Brulisauer" <> | Date | Fri, 9 Aug 2002 12:00:56 +0200 | Subject | Re: kbuild 2.5.26 - arch/alpha |
| |
On 23 Jul 2002, at 18:29, George France wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 July 2002 14:48, Oliver Pitzeier wrote: > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > You have made me aware that we have unintentionally created a > > > private sort of club. I apologize. This will have to be corrected. > > > > That's not what I expected to read... > > I think that this "private club" is not wrong at all... It just would > > be nicer if there would be some kind of batch every week where all > > alpha users/developers get a mail... > > I agree. We should send a weekly e-mail with the current status.
I did not see any news on the alpha/linux topic in lkml lately.
What is the way to keep in touch with the "private club" to help/ assist in getting further to a running 2.5.x kernel on alpha? I am still on 2.4.18 on my test system.
Did anybody use gcc-3.0.x or gcc-3.1? With gcc-3.0.4 I successfully built 2.4.18 but some applications don't run correctly (eg. MySQL -> Parser). Is the kernel compilable with gcc-3.1? Today I am using gcc-2.95.3 and I think is ok; better than egcs (generates less unaligned traps at runtime without changing the source).
Greetings, Martin
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |