Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 08 Aug 2002 09:58:47 +0200 | From | Marcin Dalecki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30 |
| |
Uz.ytkownik Jesse Barnes napisa?: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 06:21:07PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > >>On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Jesse Barnes wrote: >> >>>macro worked before? I could just remove all those checks in the scsi >>>code I guess. >> >>That would be a better option. > > > Ok. > > >>The MUST_NOT_HOLD basically means the kernel will OOPS the >>moment the lock is contended.
And for Gods sake ;-) - please call it ASSERT_ and not MUST_THIS MUST_THAT MUST_GO_TO_TOILET. For the nonanglosaxons among us the personifications already frequently enough present in english nomenclature sound already awfoul enough... Additionally gerp -i assert will work as expected, since MUST is a far more frequent term.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |