lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [bug, 2.5.29, (not IDE)] partition table (not) corruption?

On Wed, 7 Aug 2002 Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:

> LILO without "linear" or "lba32" is inherently broken: it will talk CHS
> at boot time to the BIOS and hence needs a geometry and install time,
> and nobody knows the geometry required. So, if LILO doesnt break, this
> is pure coincidence.

well, lilo without linear worked for like years on this box ...

> Since 2.5.30 many people will have a different geometry, so many people
> will have to find grub or a recent LILO, or add "linear" to their old
> LILO. This is all well understood - I just repeat it a few times in the
> hope that that will reduce the amount of email.
>
> But now you talk about vanilla 2.5.29, and I am surprised. Could you
> send the kernel boot messages concerning that disk (dmesg | grep hd) for
> 2.5.28 and 2.5.29 and 2.5.30?

will do - it might have started in 2.5.28. But since i use the BK tree, i
might have tested an 'almost 2.5.30' 2.5.29 BK tree.

> And you talk about corruption, and I am surprised again. Have you
> verified that there really was a difference? Or do you only suspect
> corruption because LILO has problem? (In that case I can assure you that
> there was no corruption.)

you are right, there was no corruption most likely. And the IDE subsystem
is most definitely innocent.

Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans