lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.4.19-ac4 IRQ messup?
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 11:39:43AM +0200, Thomas Mierau wrote:
> Thanks,
> I looked it up its called watchdog (what else). It was set to 5000ms and I
> changed it to 300ms. But the result is : no change!

by "no change", you mean "still loss of 5s" ?
If this is the case, are you sure the switch port you are connected to is
in full duplex too ? does it detect receive errors or carrier lost ? I
believe that cisco switches in "spanning tree portfast" mode block the port
during 5s after a renegociation. It's easy to detect because the port's led
becomes orange.

perhaps you can switch the 2 NIC's cables to check if the problem follows the
cable or the NIC.

else I have no other clue ...

Regards,
Willy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.104 / U:0.676 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site