![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> We're piling more and more crap in there to support these pte_chains. > How much is too much? > > Is it likely that large pages and/or shared pagetables would allow us to > place pagetables and pte_chains in the direct-mapped region, avoid all > this? On ppc64 shared pagetables will require significant changes to the way we handle the hardware hashtable. So add that to the "more and more crap in there to support these pte_chains" Will shared pagetables be a requirement or can we turn it on per arch? Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:27 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||