[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: fix CONFIG_HIGHPTE

    > We're piling more and more crap in there to support these pte_chains.
    > How much is too much?
    > Is it likely that large pages and/or shared pagetables would allow us to
    > place pagetables and pte_chains in the direct-mapped region, avoid all
    > this?

    On ppc64 shared pagetables will require significant changes to the way
    we handle the hardware hashtable. So add that to the "more and more crap
    in there to support these pte_chains"

    Will shared pagetables be a requirement or can we turn it on per arch?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.044 / U:16.152 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site