Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 06 Aug 2002 13:57:47 +0200 | From | Marcin Dalecki <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] 2.5.30 IDE 113 |
| |
Uz.ytkownik Jens Axboe napisa?:
> Ho hum, well I think it's only ugly in the way it had to be done > previously. Right now I think the usage is pretty nice, actually
Ho ho. I can't do it the pretty way, becouse the queue synchronization doesn't work as expected :-).
> request_fn(q) > { > rq = elv_next_request(); > start_request(rq); > blk_stop_queue(q); > } > > isr() > { > handle_completion(); > blk_start_queue(queue); > } > > The API works nicely regardless of queue depth and how many requests > request_fn consumes.
You know why I *hate* IDE_BUSY bit 8-)..
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |