![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 08:59:18AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 05:22:15PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Vamsi, what do you think of this patch? Is it neccessary to restore > > interrupts before handle_vm86_trap (the original patch didn't do this > > either, not sure if it's required). > > Any chance you could split the i386-specific kprobes code into > arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c instead of bloating traps.c? Agreed. Please see the latest patch. -- Vamsi Krishna S. Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore. Ph: +91 80 5044959 Internet: vamsi@in.ibm.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:27 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||