lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: context switch vs. signal delivery [was: Re: Accelerating user mode linux]
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > And threads can do queued events that amortizes context switch
> > overhead, while queued signals generate per-event signal delivery, so
> > signal delivery costs are not amortized.
> >
> > (Not that i advocate SIGIO or helper threads for highperformance IO -
> > Ben's aio interface is the fastest and most correct approach.)
>
> Isn't the per-event queued signal cost amortised when using sigwaitinfo()?

Of course I meant:

Isn't the per-event queued signal cost amortised when using sigtimedwait()?

cheers,
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.077 / U:1.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site