lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] [RFC] [2.5 i386] GCC 3.1 -march support, PPRO_FENCE reduction, prefetch fixes and other CPU-related changes
    From
    Date
    On Sun, 2002-08-04 at 21:43, Luca Barbieri wrote:
    > > When we use MMX/SSE we need the view to be consistent anyway so the
    > > various copying routines already handle this internally.
    > That's why sfence is not used unless CONFIG_X86_OOSTORE (and
    > CONFIG_X86_MMXEXT) is defined.
    > mfence and lfence instead replace the "lock; addl $0,0(%%esp)". Is this
    > wrong?

    I'm trying to understand why you think they are needed at all. Except
    for code that specifically does non-temporal we don't need fences on an
    X86, and the code that uses non temporal stores has its own fences built
    in.

    So as far as I can see the only cases we ever have to care about are

    PPro - processor bug
    IDT Winchip - because we run it in oostore module not strict x86 mode

    I don't see why you are generating extra fence instructions for other
    cases

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:27    [W:0.024 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site