![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
alan@redhat.com said: > Which would argue UML ought to have a positively microkernel view of > syscalls - sending a message ? Indeed. Ingo's mail got me thinking that alan@redhat.com said: > the alternatives like a seperate process and ptrace are not pretty either might not be so bad after all. All I would need to make this work is for one process to be able to change the mm of another. Then, the current UML tracing thread would handle the kernel side of things and sit in its own address space nicely protected from its processes. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:27 [W:1.178 / U:0.220 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||