![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread Patch in this message |
In message <3D6D8CE0.D454ED66@zip.com.au> you write:
> I just deleted the cpu_possible() test - changed it to loop
> across NR_CPUS.
Still, it's a good idea to have a UP version, and fix that naked
reference to "cpu" in cpu_online() which just makes me damn nervous.
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
Name: cpu_possible for UP
Author: Rusty Russell
Status: Trivial
D: This patch defines cpu_possible() for non-SMP.
diff -urpN --exclude TAGS -X /home/rusty/devel/kernel/kernel-patches/current-dontdiff --minimal linux-2.5.32/include/linux/smp.h working-2.5.32-cpu-possible/include/linux/smp.h
--- linux-2.5.32/include/linux/smp.h 2002-08-28 09:29:53.000000000 +1000
+++ working-2.5.32-cpu-possible/include/linux/smp.h 2002-08-29 15:30:49.000000000 +1000
@@ -94,9 +94,10 @@ int cpu_up(unsigned int cpu);
static inline void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu) { }
static inline void smp_send_reschedule_all(void) { }
#define cpu_online_map 1
-#define cpu_online(cpu) ({ cpu; 1; })
+#define cpu_online(cpu) ({ BUG_ON((cpu) != 0); 1; })
#define num_online_cpus() 1
#define num_booting_cpus() 1
+#define cpu_possible(i) ({ BUG_ON((cpu) != 0); 1; })
struct notifier_block;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:28 [W:0.109 / U:0.080 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||