lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 28 Aug 2002 16:47:12 +1000
FromRusty Russell <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched.c
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:35:49 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> wrote:
> But these are not performance-critical functions.  And by far the
> most inefficient part of them is that they're reading data for
> CPUs which cannot exist.   That can be fixed with a `cpu_possible(i)'
> test in there, but Rusty was going to give us a `for_each_cpu' macro.
> We haven't seen that yet.

I have it, but Linus isn't taking the prerequeisite, which changes cpu masks
to generic bitmaps.

Due to be retransmitted in the next couple of days,
Rusty.
-- 
   there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too
   many doers quoting their contemporaries.  -- Larry McVoy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:28    [from the cache]
©2003-2008