[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][2.5.32] CPU frequency and voltage scaling (0/4)
    On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:49:31PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > On 28 Aug 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
    > >
    > > You might want to read the paper on the original cpufreq for ARM. It
    > > gives real world cases where the user -needs- to be able to control the
    > > policy. I think you misunderstand what the interface is about. Large
    > > numbers of systems benefit from usermode policy engines.
    > That's not the point.
    > The point is that the _policy_ (not the end result) needs to be pushed
    > down to the kernel, so that the kernel can do the right thing with it.
    > That policy can be updated in "real time" from user space, of course. But
    > the fact is that you cannot just set a frequency and leave it at that, it
    > doesn't work.

    On the long term, maybe. But cpufreq is only the driver, which lets you have
    such a policy engine in the kernel. And as long as this policy engine
    doesn't exist, why not offer the user some control over his system?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.042 / U:16.060 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site