lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] M386 flush_one_tlb invlpg
From
Date
> There's another issue, which is the fact that I do not believe that invlpg 
> is even guaranteed to invalidate a G page at all - although obviously all
> current CPU's seem to work that way. However, I don't see that documented
> anywhere.
You haven't read the P4 system architecture manual, section 3.11.
It explicitly says that invlpg ignores the G flag.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.053 / U:20.720 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site