lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromDaniel Phillips <>
SubjectRe: VM changes added to performance patches for 2.4.19
DateSat, 24 Aug 2002 16:54:35 +0200
On Saturday 24 August 2002 16:36, conman@kolivas.net wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>:> > Would you be so kind as to attempt to quantify that?> > Ummm... I'm not sure if you're making fun or me? I haven't done any objective
> tests so I can't quantify it ??

Not at all.  We need to quantify such results as yours, if we can.

> I just found the responsiveness of the machine a little better and don't have
> the resources, time or inclination to test it with a benchmark.

Fair enough.

> It's my> understanding that the -aa patch performed better on benchmarks, but that some
> people reported the responsiveness was better with -rmap anyway. I'd agree with
> the latter statement. I offer both patches with mine so if people want to try my
> patch and feel strongly either way they can choose. My aim is to optimise system
> response for single cpu desktops, not multi cpu servers.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:28    [from the cache]
©2003-2008