![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Saturday 24 August 2002 16:36, conman@kolivas.net wrote: > Quoting Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de>:> > Would you be so kind as to attempt to quantify that?> > Ummm... I'm not sure if you're making fun or me? I haven't done any objective > tests so I can't quantify it ?? Not at all. We need to quantify such results as yours, if we can. > I just found the responsiveness of the machine a little better and don't have > the resources, time or inclination to test it with a benchmark. Fair enough. > It's my> understanding that the -aa patch performed better on benchmarks, but that some > people reported the responsiveness was better with -rmap anyway. I'd agree with > the latter statement. I offer both patches with mine so if people want to try my > patch and feel strongly either way they can choose. My aim is to optimise system > response for single cpu desktops, not multi cpu servers. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:28 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||