lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: cerberus errors on 2.4.19 (ide dma related)
From
Date
Preempt doesn't seem to be the culprit.  Reran the test without using
preempt and I got MEMORY errors within 22 seconds at udma2. So preempt
is not the problem here.



On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 05:19, Andre Hedrick wrote:
>
> 2.4.19-preempt
>
> All bets are off because who knows what preempt is doing to the state
> machines and in PIO you are dead.
>
> You can not delay transaction of data between interrupts w/o having the
> transport help out. But the preempt don't get it.
>
> If you push your request size down to 8k or to a page you preempt problems
> will go away, only because granularity of requests. And the price is
> performance goes in the tank. But this is preempt so who cares.




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:28    [W:0.096 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site