Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Will NFSv4 be accepted? | From | Trond Myklebust <> | Date | 15 Aug 2002 00:17:10 +0200 |
| |
>>>>> " " == Dax Kelson <dax@gurulabs.com> writes:
> I for one would REALLY like to see NFSv4 (actually, Kerberized > NFSv4 is what I'm after). I just finished setting up a > Kerberized Solaris NFS environment with home directories > automounted from the clients with strong user authentication.
> Frankly, the stock (non-Kerberized) NFS security model blows.
Note: The RPCSEC_GSS (and accompanying kerberos) stuff is completely independent of NFSv4. It is still in the process of being finalized, but when it is, it will apply to NFSv2/v3 as well as v4.
RPCSEC_GSS is not an argument for NFSv4...
Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |